Negotiating Digital Marginality: A Qualitative Study of Social Media Literacy among Slum Dwellers in Dhaka, Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2025.14.2.4325Keywords:
Social Media Literacy, Slum Dwellers, Bangladesh, Digital Inequality, Qualitative ResearchAbstract
The advent of social media has led to the emergence of new forms of community building, information sharing, and participation; however, not all parts of the Global South have responded to these opportunities in the same way. Slum dwellers and other economically and socially marginalized groups in Bangladesh are increasingly using social media, yet little is known about their level of social media literacy, which is essential for safe and meaningful engagement on these platforms. This study examines the social media literacy of Dhaka's slum inhabitants through three focus groups and twenty-four in-depth interviews with young men and women from two major urban slums, aged 18 to 35, using purposive sampling. Thematic analysis, framed by Bourdieu's concept of cultural capital and the sociology of digital inequality (Braun & Clarke, 2006), revealed that critical aspects such as misinformation, privacy, and online risks are often overlooked, while participants’ literacy remains largely functional-limited to basic navigation and messaging despite frequent mobile social media use. Four themes emerged: the use of social media for entertainment and connection; ignorance of underlying digital risks; informal learning related to digital platforms; and a desire for self-empowerment constrained by poverty, gender, and education. Overall, slum dwellers’ social media use and literacy reflect profound social inequalities, and from a sociological perspective, these findings suggest that, without structural change, digital technologies are more likely to amplify rather than mitigate social marginalization.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.
Donner, J. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile internet. MIT Press.
Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2014). Gender equality in the information society: A review of current literature and recommendations for policy and practice. IT for Change.
Haque, M. M. (2021). Online harassment of Bangladeshi women: Experiences, impacts and policy responses. Journal of Gender Studies, 30(6), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2020.1845634.
Jane, E. A. (2017). Misogyny online: A short (and brutish) history. Sage.
Livingstone, S., Bulger, M., & Zaborowski, R. (2014). Media literacy research and policy in Europe: A review of recent, current and planned activities. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
Omotayo, F. O., & Salami, O. M. (2018). Use of social media for knowledge sharing among students. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 8(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2018.8.2.174.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Rahaman, A., Haque, M. T., Sinthia, J. A., Rasel, M. S. A., Priti, S. Y., & Akter, J. (2022). Social dynamics of frequent clashes in rural Bangladesh: A study on Brahmanbaria District. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 11(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2022.11.1.3078.
Rajeev, M. M. (2018). Health accessibility and vulnerability among marginalized communities: A study in urban slums in Kerala. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 7(3), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2018.7.3.1464.
Rangaswamy, N., & Cutrell, E. (2012). Anthropology, development and ICTs: Slums, youth and the mobile internet in urban India. Information Technology & International Development, 8(2), 51–63.
Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519.
Sey, A. (2011). “We use it different, different”: Making sense of trends in mobile phone use in Ghana. New Media & Society, 13(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810393907.
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959.
van Dijk, J. A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34(4–5), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004.
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Centre for Research and Innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

